data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5401e/5401ea73a344b044711e384e8e398b99c0402448" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/755c8/755c8d7d11259e6fa796ad5a8539cfa3a899bbe8" alt=""
I wondered if my 80 mtr top loaded vertical is a good antenna for the Bruce Kelley Memorial 1929 CW QSO Party. Part of the loading is the top 6' of two of the guys. Any sway at all causes a guy to sag a little shifting the load my Hartley sees. This causes my signal to FM/wobble...distracting to say to least and aggravating if the band is crowded. I needed to know if the gain offered by the vertical over my endfed wire was enough to outweigh the the wobble it introduced.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25fc5/25fc5df81379d607e024cc100ae3e2201eeb8af1" alt=""
The reverse beacon network at http://www.reversebeacon.net/ allowed me to get a good idea of real antenna performance. All I had to do is call
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52dcf/52dcf46f98449d64f420ab0f1314ab2bc1907f58" alt=""
What I found was that for the east coast (PA) the vertical offered 4-5 dB gain throughout the night. While not a spectacular performer it is almost always better than my endfed wire...but signal reports all mention the wobble/FMing introduced by antenna sway. Based on this I'll stick with my endfed wire for the early evening hours and then switch after about 10PM when the band activity dies down a little.
For next year's Bruce Kelley QSO Party it would be nice to have this problem solved by building a '29 style amplifier to use with my Hartley. Fortunately my 1934 transmitter already has an amplifier stage in between the oscillator and the antenna. My vertical will work fine with this transmitter during the AWA Linc Cundall Memorial CW Contest in January.
No comments:
Post a Comment