Monday, October 31, 2011

The Lowe PR-150 Antenna Preselector.

Lowe produced a antenna preselector for the HF-150 to overcome the problems associated with overloading from strong signals, Lowe PR-150 preselector and preamp. The PR-150 covers 100 kHz to 30 MHz in seven bands segments. Each band segment comprises of a dual-tank LC filter circuit, each of which can tune over 2.5:1 within the intended frequency range.

Each filter is passive. For additional gain, there is a built in UHF bipolar transistor preamp which has low noise performance with a high dynamic range. There is also a broadband setting that can be used. The preamp may be switched in or out. The PR-150 also features an Attenuator and A/B antenna switch for 2 antennas.

It is built in a very solid metal alloy case matching the HF-150. On the back panel there is an Antenna A input (SO-239 or Hi-Z terminals) and an Antenna B input (Hi-Z terminals). Output to the receiver is 50 ohm impedance - SO-239. The unit requires 12 VDC at 50 ma. (and has a duplicate socket for power loop-through to other accessories).

The overall performance of the HF-150 is improved many fold when fitted to the PR-150 and I would deem that this is an essential component for the HF-150 if you wish to receive peak performance from your HF-150.

Even if you do not have a HF-150 and you are looking for something in the way of a preselector for your HF receiver, the PR-150 is probably a very wise choice.

Link to PR-150 Operation Manual (Pdf)

Specifications
Frequency coverage ......... 100 kHz to 30 MHz
Connections ................ Antenna A (SO-239 or Hi-Z terminals), Antenna B (Hi-Z terminals)
Attenuator ................. -16dB
Preamp ..................... +10dB
Insertion Loss ............. 5-10dB
Output to the Receiver ..... SO-239 50 ohm nominal
Power Requirement .......... 12 VDC @50 ma (11-15 VDC)
Size ....................... 7.25 x 3 x 7 inches (185x80x175 1.1 kg)matching HF-150
read more "The Lowe PR-150 Antenna Preselector."

Sunday, October 30, 2011

More 1928 Hartley

Well, it's in the log...the first QSO. Tonight I worked Lou, VE3AWA, on 3565. We were 549-559 both ways and had a nice contact going until 80 meter QRM caught up with us. Lou was using his Push-Pull TPTG transmitter with a NC101X. I had my HRO Sr paired with the Hartley running 10 watts input and about 3 watts out.

For this contact I added an extension to the main tuning capacitor shaft. Both my TNT and this Hartley are really sensitive to hand capacity. Adding 8" to the tuning shaft helped a lot as I moved onto frequency. I also used a VT-25, the military version of the type 10.

Not obvious in the Hartley list of parts are the National Velvet Vernier dials used by Ross Hull. These make a big difference adding mechanical bandspread to help overcome the 80 meter CW band being crammed into a few degrees of capacitor rotation at one end of its travel.

Lou asked how come my signal was so stable. Antennas swinging in the wind typically shift the transmitter frequency as the load changes. My 105' inverted "L" happens to be a little low (only 10-20' off the ground) and behind a ridge so it is protected from the west winds. I also run with the antenna loosely coupled to the transmitter. Output is only about three watts instead of the 5-6 watts the transmitter is capable of at maximum coupling.

The RF choke is now one I hand wound on a 3/4" piece of wooden rod like Ross Hull's original 1928 design. It doesn't have quite as many turns as he called for but it works fine.
read more "More 1928 Hartley"

Sunday, October 23, 2011

A short diatribe about floating point numbers

Floats. They're great! You can store really large or really small numbers in them with ease (provided they're supported by your compiler). Most processors even have built in instructions for playing with them. However, they are an imprecise number, which means that whatever value you try to put in may not be the value you get out.

Take for example the counter system I installed in a factory - the processor we used could only support 16-bit integers, or 32-bit floats. I thought, "Great! 32-bit floats go all the way up to ~4bn, we'll never have bigger counts than that". And we wont. The problem is, just because they can count to 4bn, doesn't mean that they can count ever number in between.

I knew about this problem, but I thought it only applied to small fractions after the decimal point. Unfortunately (as I discovered today with 100+ counters), there are also whole numbers it cannot display.

The first one of these (on a 32-bit float) is 16,777,217. So whenever you try to increment the counter after 16,777,216, the processor adds 1 to the number, then stores it back in the float as the closest representable number (16,777,216). Do you see the problem?

There's a very good reason for this, which I really don't want to have to explain because I hate working with the binary representations of floats. If you have to know, try the Wikipedia article on IEEE 754-2008.

So, long story short: do not use floats for counters!
read more "A short diatribe about floating point numbers"

Friday, October 21, 2011

More 1928 Hartley


After a little debugging it works!

When I first put power to my version of Ross Hull's Hartley transmitter I could only get it to oscillate if the cathode clip is either not attached at all or clipped to the tank coil near the plate (rather than grid) end. RF with the clip this high on the tank coil is detectable on a nearby receiver but not measurable at the transmitter antenna.

It turned out that all things that look like RF chokes don't make good RF chokes. Mine from my junque box looked like a single layer vintage RF choke, it tested good for continuity and B+ showed up at the tube socket but didn't work well in this circuit. Replacing it with a
more modern RF choke fixed my problem. I'll need to go back and hand wind one like shown in the original 1928 QST article.

I also needed a 4:1 balun to match well to a 50 ohm load.

Now with 300 V B+ and about 25mA input I can push it to over three watts out. Backing off gives me a clean 2 watts out.

Thank you to several AWA friends that helped with parts and advice.
read more "More 1928 Hartley"

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

More 1928 Hartley




Except for a couple of coil clips my clone of Ross Hull's 1928 Hartley is complete. It's ready for power and checkout.
read more "More 1928 Hartley"

Saturday, October 15, 2011

More 1928 Hartley


Today we have surface-mount-technology, before that we had pin-in-hole printed circuit cards, before that point-to-point wiring and before that we had breadboards. With breadboard construction came solid bus bar wiring. Bus bar is stiff enough that wiring takes on a 3D sort of aspect. Wiring of a transmitter such as this Hartley has height along with depth and width.
read more "More 1928 Hartley"

Friday, October 14, 2011

More 1928 Hartley


Working through this project has given me a new appreciation of the homebrewing skills of many of the hams during the twenties and thirties. The article on this particular transmitter has some gaps in the construction details....for coil turn information the builder is referred to the coil photo, to count the turns himself....and....Keying method is a reference to another chapter and, again, left to the builder to figure out.

I chose cathode keying for my version. I also buried the cathode resistors under the tuning capacitor. Keying added two additional Fahnestock clips along the left hand side. From the front mine lays out as keying (hot side), keying (ground side), filament, filament, B-/ground and B+.
read more "More 1928 Hartley"

Thursday, October 13, 2011

More 1928 Hartley


That pile of old parts, wood and copper tubing is starting to look like a transmitter. The eight parts left are mostly to be wired into place so things should speed up a little.

The unsung hero of any project like this is a drill press. Without one you could never get all of the holes right.
read more "More 1928 Hartley"

Sunday, October 2, 2011

More 1928 Hartley


With (plexi)glass rods ordered and one additional National DX capacitor in the mail from a friend the next step is some table saw time.
read more "More 1928 Hartley"